Imran Khan’s Bani Gala property raises some questions.
PTI ASSETS DECLARATION
The questions are being raised about the assets declaration by PTI and particularly Imran Khan. Without going into the nitty-gritty of the wealth statement and the wealth reconciliation made public by Khan, this very effort by a political party of Pakistan is very laudable and commendable.
Even going any further, I will again voice some serious concerns about the experts employed by media including the private channels. Many articles I have pointed out which were published in Dawn regarding the cases under process in the courts which were devoid of any legal expertise. One understand the costs issues entangling the small papers and media houses, but one fails to understand why likes of Dawn, The News, Geo etc cannot employ the experts in the concerning fields. Is it so, that they are not bothered about the quality, thinking nobody will read these or the readers are lackeys like the general public. Perhaps it is high time they should realize it and give us better information and education.
Let me clear it at the outset that the wealth statement and the reconciliation are required to be declared at cost under the income tax law prevalent in Pakistan. It is not the wealth tax return which used to be filed at the market price under the abolished wealth tax act. By the way, this wealth tax was the biggest source of tax revenue affecting the wealthy and power elites directly. Hence one of the very first steps taken by General Musharaf in 1999 was to trash this law (the assets of the generals started bulging beyond proportions since 1980). It must have been a decision with demand and consensus!
The famous Khan palace at Bani Gala Islamabad was shown as gift and at nil value. Another property situated in the same vicinity was declared at more than five million rupees. A flat in Islamabad is also reflected besides few inherited properties. An agricultural land is indicated as inherited.
These statements seem to be good for tax purposes as the incumbent FBR is never going to touch this file. I had seen two files going under lock and lost keys, one was of Benazir in 1988 (Karachi) and the other one was the personal file of General Mush, in 1999 (Rawalpindi). It should meet the same fate and not different as Mr Khan can become the next PM of Pakistan.
The first real and serious question asked by the writer in his article (published in The News) as why the Khan palace was shown as gifted. Whereas it is known that Khan has publically declared this property first purchased by borrowed money belonging to his former wife which was later returned to her, out of the sale proceeds of a flat in London. It is, however, a serious flaw and need to be clarified. The terms gift and loan are not “and” and “or” and not interchangeable at all by any means.
If the transaction was done as claimed by Khan publically then the full cost of acquisition should have been reflected in wealth statements. There is no doubt that a barren hillock was purchased by him at the time when there was no development in that particular area and the price was very marginal. If for any plausible explanation, it was purchased by his wife on her own name and transferred on his name after the money was paid to her. If it was shown as a gift to save some money legally in transfer, this fact should have been admitted.
This also demeans his claims of having the experts in every field. This, otherwise, a splendid effort was dwarfed by the lack of professional advice. This tax return belongs to not an ordinary person but to a sole hope of Pakistani youth. This merited serious considerations as he is the one with sky high claims of transparency in assets declaration and tax matters.
These documents should been accompanied by the notes and explanation by the accountant or the tax advisor. The Bani Gala house was built over the years and showing it at nil value is farce. It must have been reconciled with actual cost of purchase and the cost of construction.
The property declared at Rs.50, 50,000 should have been properly linked up to the year of purchase and the breakup of the cost clearly shown. Is it an estimated amount with round figure? Is some spurious tax practitioner from FBR is running the show? If it is the case then what about the alleged qualification and virtues of other team members? The serious question of this sort cannot be left unanswered by terming them as “well left”.
Ducking on the other inherited properties, there is a huge chunk of inherited agricultural land. I did not know that Khan’s ancestors were so rich that they left squares of land for him in Southern Punjab!
Nobody including me would believe that he has got furniture worth only Rs 200,000 in his Roman Castle at Bani Gala (leaving well left the other inherited properties).
Thanks God Parado was declared but cash in hand at 5.3 million is quite astounding for me.
Income of Rs 21.5 millions does not corroborate with the personal expenditure of 6.6 million even if we ignore the agriculture income which is tax exempted.
There seem to be another pitfall. The amount of 24.3 million stacked in foreign currency account is not shown in the wealth statement although this is not includable in the total wealth. There is an amount appearing in Pak rupee not shown as part of the assets. This may be the same amount shown inadvertently in rupees instead of dollars.
Being a supporter is one thing and being intolerant to non sense is another trait. The high standards set and claimed by Khan himself forced us to expect much more professionalism and translucency. It is perfectly legal to revise the returns and, bring rationale and more explanation to these from your experts Mr Khan otherwise; you will lose people faster than you steeped them.